Respect Renewal site

Politics for the non-conservative...
Post Reply
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26463
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Respect Renewal site

Post by faceless »

[web]https://www.respectrenewal.org/[/web]
https://www.respectrenewal.org/

Finally they've got round to making a decent site that looks like it could grow and be useful - excellent. Now, if Galloway's official site linked to it, instead of the old Respect site, then that would probably be a good thing...
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5609
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

yeah not a bad start, i've never liked that respect logo though - the typeface, its like whats the worst font we could use - that'll do! lots of sections though so like you say hopefully it'll grow :)

i notice they didn't credit you for the newnight rip though - the cheek! :lol:
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26463
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

well, I did slag em off for the Burns night... haha

I'll get in contact though.
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Re: Respect Renewal site

Post by Mandy »

faceless wrote:Now, if Galloway's official site linked to it, instead of the old Respect site, then that would probably be a good thing...
It does link to new site (has been for a while) .. near bottom of right hand frame.

luke wrote:i notice they didn't credit you for the newnight rip though - the cheek! :lol:
The video has the Couchtripper wave .. so maybe they felt that is enough attribution. Of-course, if anyone clicks through to YouTube they will see it as well.
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26463
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

the link on the 'LINKS' page goes to the old Respect site. I've only just noticed the one you're talking about - it's a simple text link that doesn't draw much attention at all, so maybe you should sort that. A casual browser is very unlikely to click that.

As far as them not giving credit for the video - they didn't give any attribution in the slightest, and if they assumed that it was ok not to, because I'd taken the time to watermark stuff, they would be just noobie arses. But I don't know them at all, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on that.
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

Thanks for the feedback
Post Reply