Balding D-List Celebrity Twat wrote:That's nonsense, silly. The pockets are smaller, but so are the balls, and snooker players break like girls with syphilis.Marky wrote: (pool) It's something played with 20 times more skill than pool players and if you are unsure watch this 147 on a snooker table by Ronnie O Sullivian in just over five minutes , and then do shut the fuck up.
<object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/McThDshEgU0&re ... ram><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/McThDshEgU0&rel=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object>
Oh and notice the size of the pockets , NOT AS BIG AS THE AMERICAN ONES YOU SEE...
Snooker players come over to america to play all the time, and usually do well once they adapt, but none dominate.
American pool requires much more use of english or "side" than snooker, and in rotation based games like 9 and 10 ball which the pros primarily play the lack of a hard break and the lack of skill with spinning the balls with english is the downfall of the snooker player.
A lot of english guys came over to america to play in the IPT when it was in full swing with huge prize money, but none of them ever even won an event.
The lack of skill with spinning the balls is the downfall of the snooker player!! haha and I say again ha!