Swastika House!

serious, weird or whatever - it's up to you
User avatar
Lostinthestates
admin
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Bethlehem, USA

Swastika House!

Post by Lostinthestates »

[web]https://www.flickr.com/photos/93592462@N00/143053448[/web]

Thought this was quite funny! The architect must have been completely oblivious or was pulling a prank joke!
User avatar
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Posts: 4118
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Sunshine State

Post by SpursFan1902 »

I can't believe that it is just now become an issue...or better stated, that it is an issue. The building (according to CNN headline this morning) was built in the 60's, so it has been a swastika shaped building all of this time, without consequence. Now they are planning to spend 600K to change it. Not the best way to spend the money, IMO.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5609
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

i remember seeing this a few years back with google earth - funny really that they're going to spend 600k on redoing it!

interesting you say it was built in the 60's, so they knew of the swastika at the time ...

on that same page they have a link to this ...

[web]https://flickr.com/photos/hastalasiesta/ ... 079059537/[/web]
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

I totally agree Spurs. It's a total waste of time and money. Especially if it was built BEFORE WWII.

It's not the symbol that is evil, scary, offensive, whatever. It's the meaning we tie to it.
User avatar
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Posts: 4118
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Sunshine State

Post by SpursFan1902 »

I believe that it was originally a Buddhist symbol (seems to me I learned that on this forum...), so it is the 20th century connotation that is offensive, not the symbol. Just one more reason to hate Hitler.....as if we need more!
User avatar
Lostinthestates
admin
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Bethlehem, USA

Post by Lostinthestates »

I think the Buddhist symbol is the mirror image of the Swastika used by the Nazis - not quite sure about why I am posting this :)
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

SpursFan1902 wrote:I believe that it was originally a Buddhist symbol (seems to me I learned that on this forum...), so it is the 20th century connotation that is offensive, not the symbol. Just one more reason to hate Hitler.....as if we need more!
It's Buddhist, Hindu and Jainism. Originally from Sanskrit.
I have quite a few Hindu pieces of art around my home and the symbol is on it.
Once again it's the meaning you attach to the symbol. Not the symbol itself.
I can understand if this building was made this way on purpose to be a symbol of hate. But it wasn't. It wasn't even meant to be the Asian representation of it. It was just done to make a building with a courtyard and have space.
With all the problems we have in this world, this is what people focus on and get upset about? Geez.
It's like the people in Chicago protesting and picketing the changing of Marshall's Fields store to be changed to Macy's!
User avatar
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Posts: 4118
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Sunshine State

Post by SpursFan1902 »

Skylace wrote:
SpursFan1902 wrote:I believe that it was originally a Buddhist symbol (seems to me I learned that on this forum...), so it is the 20th century connotation that is offensive, not the symbol. Just one more reason to hate Hitler.....as if we need more!
It's like the people in Chicago protesting and picketing the changing of Marshall's Fields store to be changed to Macy's!
Oh no, that's much different!! Marshall Fields is a cherished childhood memory and Macy's is a parade...

:lol:
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

SpursFan1902 wrote:
Oh no, that's much different!! Marshall Fields is a cherished childhood memory and Macy's is a parade...

:lol:
:lol: You've put it all into perspective for me!
User avatar
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Posts: 4118
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Sunshine State

Post by SpursFan1902 »

Skylace wrote: :lol: You've put it all into perspective for me!
Glad I could help...:thumbs:
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5609
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

looks like they really are going to spend 600k on it!

[web]https://rawstory.com//news/2007/Navy_to_ ... _0926.html[/web]
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

Total waste of money.

"rooftop photovoltaic cells." : Maybe to make it a "stealth" / "cloaked" building so it looks like grass from the sky -- The Kilingons would be proud of the new technology .. after all, a building is bigger than a space ship.

Here's a suggestion : Demolish one of the legs of the "L" .. or close off one of the courtyards, so it is square.
User avatar
Lostinthestates
admin
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Bethlehem, USA

Post by Lostinthestates »

It's PC gone mad!!
User avatar
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Posts: 4118
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Sunshine State

Post by SpursFan1902 »

My tax dollars at work!
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

Post Reply