184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba

serious, weird or whatever - it's up to you
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

Skylace wrote:Decide what?
what happens in cuba
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

luke wrote:
Skylace wrote:Decide what?
what happens in cuba
I am a firm believer it's the people's right of whatever country they are in to decide.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

:)
User avatar
Marcella-FL
Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: KMC, Germany

Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba

Post by Marcella-FL »

luke wrote:just when you thought the american goverment couldn't piss you off anymore ...
Stick around - we'll try harder.

So if those other 184 nations are so concerned for Cuba why don't they "pick up the slack"?
Skylace wrote:
Decide what?

luke wrote:
what happens in cuba
stays in Cuba? unless it heads to the USA on the back of a dolphin.

Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries?
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba

Post by Skylace »

Marcella-FL wrote:
luke wrote:just when you thought the american goverment couldn't piss you off anymore ...
Stick around - we'll try harder.

So if those other 184 nations are so concerned for Cuba why don't they "pick up the slack"?
Skylace wrote:
Decide what?

luke wrote:
what happens in cuba
stays in Cuba? unless it heads to the USA on the back of a dolphin.

Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries?
I'm with you Marcella. I don't like the illegals coming over. They have honestly caused a lot more problems in Florida than good. If they want to be able to come over legally they should be allowed to but otherwise no.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba

Post by luke »

Marcella-FL wrote:Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries?
thats not being nit-picky? :lol:
User avatar
Marcella-FL
Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: KMC, Germany

Post by Marcella-FL »

yeah I know I know ... it's like saying "no offense but .." and then go on to be offensive.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

UN member states condemn US embargo of Cuba for 20th consecutive year

The U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to condemn the U.S. embargo against Cuba for the 20th year in a row.

The final tally was 186-2, with only Israel joining the United States as it did last year. The small Pacific nations of Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands abstained as they also did last year.

Last year’s tally for the symbolic measure was almost identical, 187-2, with three abstentions.

Envoys for Vietnam, Russia, Nicaragua and many other countries, as well as the 120-member Nonaligned Movement, spoke Tuesday in favor of the measure calling for the end of the American embargo against the Caribbean country.

“The only consequences of the sanctions are the deterioration of the living standard of the Cuban population, creation of artificial barriers to its economic growth and infringement on the rights and interests of third countries,” Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez said that the sanctions have caused direct economic damages of close to $1 trillion to the Cuban people over nearly half a century.

The United States has not eased the embargo in the nearly three years since President Barack Obama’s election raised hopes for a change in policy, he added.

“Despite the false image of flexibility that the current U.S. administration intends to portray, the blockade and the sanctions remain intact,” Rodriguez told the assembly.

“Why doesn’t President Obama’s administration take care of the U.S. problems and leave us Cubans alone to solve ours in peace?”

The United States has made clear it is not prepared to lift the sanctions entirely until the communist-run nation makes more far-reaching political and economic changes.

American Ambassador Ronald D. Godard, U.S. Senior Area Adviser for Western Hemisphere Affairs, said the embargo is a bilateral issue and “not appropriately a concern of this assembly.”

Godard said the sanctions represent “just one aspect of U.S. policy toward Cuba, whose overarching goal is to encourage a more open environment in Cuba and increased respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asi ... story.html
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26492
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

Consistently drachonian. What an attitude...
Post Reply