network through router for a dummy :)

for all net-related stuff
User avatar
Bob
admin
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:28 am
Location: US

Post by Bob »

Mandy wrote:I

Though this seems a typo. In this setup, you MUST use a cross-over cable.
These days, most NIC's don't require one as they can cross over on the fly on their own...
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

Bob wrote:
Mandy wrote:I

Though this seems a typo. In this setup, you MUST use a cross-over cable.
These days, most NIC's don't require one as they can cross over on the fly on their own...
I must get with the times :) Us old phobies didn't even realise NICs had that option / auto-sensing ability :)

Anyway, that implies either cable would work.
User avatar
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Post by major.tom »

Mandy wrote:
Bob wrote:
Mandy wrote:Though this seems a typo. In this setup, you MUST use a cross-over cable.
These days, most NIC's don't require one as they can cross over on the fly on their own...
I must get with the times :) Us old phobies didn't even realise NICs had that option / auto-sensing ability :)
Me neither. That's pretty cool that newer NIC's can handle this automatically.
Anyway, that implies either cable would work.
...as long as the NIC supports it.

My original error was the product of a murky memory. Nicely spotted. :D
User avatar
faceless Online
Posts: 26489
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

So, is using MSN messenger to utilise remote desktop, and windows firewall to block internet use when not required, the easiest way to come as close as possible to what was asked?

Answers by email to overcomplicated@boilingwater.com !
User avatar
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Post by major.tom »

I haven't used MSN messenger for this, but assuming it works, sure.

I was focusing more on the network topology that would prevent the 2nd computer from having access to the 'net. There are various tools you can use for remote desktop (eg. PC Anywhere, etc).

"Clustering" the two pc's to act as one (shared CPU & RAM) is much tougher nut to crack. You'd need some enterprise software like Microsoft Application Center for that.
Last edited by major.tom on Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brown Sauce
admin
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:40 pm

Post by Brown Sauce »

it's only to share rendering. Backburner, as far as I'm aware does for max, I've managed to find royal render and will try with that when I find a few minutes / hours ... :)
User avatar
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Post by major.tom »

...on the subject of Windows Firewall...

I don't have a very high opinion of it. a) it doesn't do outbound filtering, so if not being able to access the net is a requirement, it wouldn't do that. And b) unless you're running as a user with no admin privileges, pretty much any program will automatically open up a door on it and accept inbound connections from any computer that can reach it. If both computers are inside a router, no harm done, but there's no benefit either (unless you don't trust the ppl in your home). :D

Some routers might allow you to filter outbound traffic from a specific PC on your local network, but my Linksys doesn't. Maybe Netgear or Cisco. Or even Dlink.
Post Reply